Section 18 Valuation

Section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 does two things. Its first limb caps damages for disrepair at the diminution in value of the landlord's reversion caused by the breach. Its second limb bars recovery entirely where the premises are to be demolished or so structurally altered that the repairs would be valueless.

Section 18 Valuation — tenant-side advice from Chris McGarrigle MRICS
3 min readTenant side onlyChris McGarrigle MRICS

How the diminution is measured

Two valuations of the landlord's interest at lease end: one in the condition the premises should have been in had the covenants been performed, one in their actual condition. The difference is the cap. Where a purchaser would not discount for the disrepair — because the incoming occupier would strip out anyway — the diminution can be far less than the cost of works, and sometimes nil.

Supersession

Where the landlord's own works supersede the tenant's repairing obligations — a full refurbishment, a change of use, a reconfiguration — those items drop out of the claim. Establishing the landlord's actual intentions, through marketing evidence, planning applications and contractor instructions, is often the single most valuable piece of work on a dilapidations file.

When to run the argument

A Section 18 valuation is worth commissioning where the claim is substantial, where the building is dated or the location weak, or where there is any sign of redevelopment. It is not needed on every schedule, and I will say when it is not.

Common questions

Ask a question

Live assistant — section 18 valuation

Ask anything about this topic and get an immediate answer drawn from this page. General guidance only — specific advice depends on your lease.

Talk it through

Initial advice is free — tenant side only.

Chris McGarrigle MRICS, chartered since 1989, acting for occupiers across England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland.

chris@mcgarrigle.com

Related guides