The practical differences
- Own knowledge: an expert may rely on it; an arbitrator generally may not
- Evidence: submissions matter to an expert but do not bind the outcome
- Costs: an expert usually cannot award costs unless the lease says so, so Calderbank offers carry less weight
- Liability: an expert can be sued for negligence; an arbitrator has statutory immunity
- Speed and cost: determination is usually quicker and cheaper
Which suits a tenant
Where your evidence is strong and the landlord's is thin, arbitration rewards the better-prepared party. Where local market knowledge favours you, or where the sum at stake will not justify a full arbitration, expert determination is more proportionate. Some clauses give a choice — that choice should be made deliberately.
Making the submission count
Even though an expert can look beyond the submissions, a clear, well-evidenced case framed around the exact wording of the review clause routinely moves determinations. Vague submissions invite the expert to fall back on their own broad-brush view.
Common questions
Ask a question
Live assistant — rent review independent expert
Ask anything about this topic and get an immediate answer drawn from this page. General guidance only — specific advice depends on your lease.
Talk it through
Initial advice is free — tenant side only.
Chris McGarrigle MRICS, chartered since 1989, acting for occupiers across England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland.
chris@mcgarrigle.comRelated guides
- Rent Review ArbitrationHow rent review arbitration works under the Arbitration Act 1996: appointment, directions, submissions, awards, costs and when to settle instead.
- Commercial Rent Review SurveyorChartered surveyor acting for tenants at commercial rent review — evidence, negotiation, arbitration and expert determination across the UK and Ireland.
- Rent Review Surveyor for TenantsA rent review surveyor acting for tenants only — no landlord instructions, no conflicts. Evidence-led negotiation across retail, leisure and F&B.
